World Chess Championship 1993: the split that changed history

A world championship that became two

The year 1993 became one of the most dramatic and controversial in the history of chess.
For the first time in decades, the world witnessed not just a battle for the crown, but a
split of the very concept of the “world champion”.

Instead of one title, there were two.
Instead of a single path, two opposing camps.
And it was this championship that forever changed the structure of professional chess.

---

Background: a conflict years in the making

By the early 1990s, the chess world was already under strain.
Garry Kasparov — the dominant champion, charismatic leader, and chief ambassador of chess —
was increasingly in conflict with FIDE.

Main reasons:

• discontent with financial conditions
• poor organization of matches
• the desire of leading players to control the process

When it became clear that the Kasparov–Nigel Short match would be organized by FIDE
without regard for their demands, the unthinkable happened.

---

The split: the creation of the PCA and two world championships

Kasparov and Short broke away from FIDE and announced that their match would be held under the
auspices of the PCA (Professional Chess Association).

In response, FIDE:

• stripped Kasparov of his title
• organized an alternative championship match
• declared its own world champion

Thus, in 1993, two world championships emerged:

• “Classical” (PCA): Kasparov vs. Short
• “Official” (FIDE): Karpov vs. Timman

---

Kasparov vs. Short (London, PCA)

This match was considered the main one in terms of playing strength.

Key facts:

• venue: London
• format: 24 games
• style: tough, principled, strategic

Kasparov dominated:

• confidently controlled the course of the match
• outclassed Short in opening preparation
• applied strong psychological pressure

Final score: 12.5 : 7.5 in favor of Kasparov.

He retained the title of classical world champion.

---

Karpov vs. Timman (FIDE)

At the same time, FIDE held its own title match.

Participants:

• Anatoly Karpov — a legend of positional chess
• Jan Timman — the strongest representative of the West

Karpov demonstrated experience and stability, winning with a score of
12.5 : 8.5 and becoming world champion under the FIDE banner.

Thus, the chess world was officially divided.

---

Consequences: two champions, one crisis

The 1993 split led to serious consequences:

• confusion among fans
• a weakening of the title’s prestige
• competition between organizations
• a decline in sponsor confidence

Young players found it increasingly difficult to understand
which path truly led to the crown.

---

Why 1993 became a turning point

The 1993 World Championship:

• destroyed FIDE’s monopoly
• demonstrated the power of players as an independent force
• exposed the need for reform
• laid the groundwork for the future reunification of the title

Without this crisis, chess might have remained trapped in an outdated, inflexible system.

---

The long road to reunification

The split lasted more than ten years.
Only in 2006 was the world championship title finally reunified.

But it was the events of 1993 that:

• changed the economics of chess
• strengthened the role of the elite
• made professional chess more open

---

The year chess became different

The 1993 World Championship was not just two matches.
It was a point of no return.

Chess ceased to be a single, unified mechanism.
Players realized their power.
The world understood that the crown was not only about moves on the board, but also about politics.

That is why 1993 is still considered one of the most important and controversial years in chess history —
the year when the game went beyond the board.